๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Cooker.hl | ็‰ˆๆœฌไน‹ๅญ |๐Ÿ…ฟ๏ธ (Theo Arc)
@CookerFlips
Founder @PastelAlpha | DM web3ven on Telegram for Business | Sign up for | |
๊ฐ€์ž… October 2019
4.9K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    143.7K ํŒฌ
Current metrics (approx. as of late July 2026): ~$41M market cap / FDV, price ~$0.052, circulating supply ~782M (from 1B original, with >21โ€“22% already burned). Protocol revenue annualized at ~$37.5M, of which ~$36M (~80%) goes to buybacks and burns (holders revenue). Recent 24h revenue around $180k and strong 7d figures support the run-rate; earlier periods showed lower but still elevated activity with rapid burns. Buyback yield is currently very high (~85โ€“90% annualized at the present mcap), implying a price-to-buyback multiple of roughly 1.1โ€“1.2x. This is a sharp discount versus historical and recent comparables for (PUMP), which has traded at substantially higher multiples of its buyback/revenue flows (often several times, with lower percentage yields on a much larger base). Fair mcap considerations โ€ข The aggressive, revenue-funded buy-and-burn (plus ongoing supply reduction) is a core strength and creates a direct flywheel: more launches/trading โ†’ higher fees โ†’ more burns โ†’ tighter supply. Dominance on Robinhood Chain (high market share of launchpad volume) and planned V2 upgrades support the case for sustained activity in the near term. โ€ข Major risks include the short track record, competition from other launchpads on the chain, potential volatility or fade in meme-launch volume (common in this sector), and the fact that the broader Robinhood Chain ecosystem is still young and smaller than Solana. โ€ข Relative valuation: Applying a more normalized multiple (e.g., 3โ€“6x annualized buyback/revenue, closer to mature or mid-cycle launchpad tokens rather than the extreme current discount) on a sustained $20โ€“40M buyback run-rate points to a range of roughly $80โ€“180M. A more conservative case (revenue halves and multiple stays modest) lands nearer $50โ€“100M; a bullish case (revenue holds or grows modestly with continued burns and market share) can justify $150M+. In short, at ~$41M the token screens as cheap on pure revenue-to-buyback metrics given the current run-rate and deflationary pressure. A โ€œfairโ€ zone that better balances the high yield against execution and sustainability risks is in the $80โ€“150M area if revenue remains robust
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ