Domingo_gou｜买美股上WEEX
@Domingo_gou
가입 July 2014
19.3K 팔로잉 중 48.9K 팬
If both paths in @TermMaxFi latest Dual Investment diagram carry the same income lines, where does the product actually split?
The branch arrives at maturity.
Both start with a USDT deposit. The preview shows put premium plus passive yield from @aave on each path, with the passive-yield layer still marked coming soon. Above strike, the puts expire and the terminal state stays USDT.
Below strike, the puts are exercised and the terminal state becomes the target asset at strike.
That makes the diagram surprisingly clean to read as a state machine one starting asset, one shared income path, two possible terminal asset states. The cash-flow layer can stay the same while the balance sheet ends somewhere different.
That distinction is the useful part. Yield tells you where income may come from during the path. Maturity tells you what you actually finish holding when the cycle closes. TermMax has finally put those two questions on separate layers.
@TermMaxFi #TermMax#
더 보기
Three cards sit on the same Daily Draw screen. They share a page, while each keeps its own crowd and its own 200,000 AP pool.
The Aug. 4 draw showed why that matters. TSLAon had 28,477 joined, while NVDAon and QQQon were around 13.3K each. Those numbers only describe one day’s crowd; they do not establish long-term asset demand.
@TermMaxFi settles every card locally: one asset, one direction result, one set of correct picks, one denominator. A large crowd on TSLAon cannot become the divisor for NVDAon or QQQon in the same draw.
Daily Draw may look like one popularity contest split across three pictures. The settlement tells a different story: one interface, three separate result units. The screen is shared; the accounting stays local.
더 보기
