Enactra AI(@EnactraAI):See the leap from Grok 4.6 to 4.7 for yourself🧐 Missing walls, inside-out surfaces, blurry textures… Grok 4.7 fixes much of this, producing more faithful, complete, and detailed buildings. On BuildingBench, both at xhigh: ➤ Score: 0.696 → 0.783 (+12.5%) ➤ Median cost per building: $10.59 → $11.43 (+8%) A substantial quality jump for a modest cost increase. It's surely a strong release! @milichab @veggie

2026.09.21 22:20

See the leap from Grok 4.6 to 4.7 for yourself🧐 Missing walls, inside-out surfaces, blurry textures… Grok 4.7 fixes much of this, producing more faithful, complete, and detailed buildings. On BuildingBench, both at xhigh: ➤ Score: 0.696 → 0.783 (+12.5%) ➤ Median cost per building: $10.59 → $11.43 (+8%) A substantial quality jump for a modest cost increase. It's surely a strong release! @milichab @veggie_eric @elonmusk

Enactra AI@EnactraAI

2026.09.21 20:04

Grok’s leap isn’t just in coding—it’s showing up in 3D simulation, too 🏗️ Grok 4.7 (xhigh) scores 0.783 on BuildingBench, taking Grok from #9# to #3#! A big jump from 4.6’s 0.695. It now trails only GPT‑6 Astra (ultra, 0.843) and Fable 5.1 (max, 0.814). Median cost per building: $11.43, versus Astra’s $7.11 and Fable 5.1’s $33.15. Around 66% cheaper than Fable. Congrats @SpaceXAI and @ElonMusk! Coding agents are getting better at building the world.