๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Nicholas Hornstein
@GIMedOnc
GI Med Oncologist @NorthwellHealth via Fellow @MDAndersonNews + IM @UCLAHealth | CUMC โ€˜18 | Interests: ML/AI, Clinical Trials, CRC | COI:
๊ฐ€์ž… November 2020
870 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    2.8K ํŒฌ
World Lung is in full swing, which means the press releases are coming fast (before the papers or the sessions). ๐Ÿซ Why do we care in GI? Because all the shiny things start in lung and eventually make their way over here. HARMONi-2 compared ivonescimab vs pembrolizumab in PD-L1+ advanced NSCLC. We already knew the PFS result was kind of wild (in a China-only study): 11.1 vs 5.8 months HR 0.51 Now OS: ๐Ÿ”ฅ 30.8 vs 22.6 months ๐Ÿ”ฅ HR 0.73 PD-L1 โ‰ฅ50%: HR 0.58 PD-L1 1โ€“49%: HR 0.85 So now this PD-1 x VEGF bispecific has beaten pembrolizumab for both PFS and OS in a randomized phase III trial. Yes, China only. Yes, pembro monotherapy is not really the comparator most of us would want for PD-L1 1โ€“49%. Still. An 8-month OS difference is quite a bit. GI oncologists should be paying attention because this is already cooking in the first line mCRC setting with HARMONi-GI3. mFOLFOX6 + ivonescimab vs mFOLFOX6 + bevacizumab Is this an end-run around patent protection laws and PD1/PDL1's run out of time? (yes) Does the strategy have synergystic benefit? Time will tell. @OncoAlert @TheGutOncLab @Onco_Nexus
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ