๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Gradient
@Gradient_HQ
Open infrastructure for open intelligence. Lattica ยท Parallax ยท Echo
๊ฐ€์ž… May 2024
76 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    705.9K ํŒฌ
When you scale parallel agents, prompt updates degrade fast. The more trajectories you process concurrently, the more generic your learned prompts become. Our researchers worked with @lihanc02 and team on Combee to rethink how aggregation works at scale. Results held up across GEPA and ACE even past 80 concurrent agents. Read more on this research๐Ÿ‘‡
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
Prompt Learning does not scale for parallel agents. More parallel agents ๐Ÿค– = worse prompts ๐Ÿ˜ญ Why? Processing too many trajectories concurrently damages the prompt update process ๐Ÿ We fix this with Combee : โ†’ preserves high-quality learnt system prompt โ†’ scales to more than 80 concurrent agents โ†’ up to 17ร— speedup without quality drop on top of ACE and GEPA ๐ŸฅฝUse Cases: 1. Prompt learning on large scale collected agent traces 2. Parallel agent learning online with fast knowledge sharing Read more below to learn how agents actually learn at scale โฌ‡๏ธ
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ