가입 후 초대 링크를 공유하면 동영상 재생 및 초대 보상을 받을 수 있습니다.

Greg Kamradt
@GregKamradt
President @arcprize, builder/engineer
가입 January 2011
1K 팔로잉 중    51K 팬
My additions to these: * The "secret" of AGI (if it starts as one) will last 6 months, max * There will be as many AGI algorithms as there are sorting algorithms (a lot) * The default way to communicate with AGI will be stateful (to support continual learning) but stateless will be available for momento use cases * Not every device will need AGI. My dishwasher doesn't need AGI * The most interesting optimization problem will be discovering the minimum description length of AGI. The "nanogpt" speedrun of AGI * The actual robotics wave won't happen till AGI. Yes ther will be "waymo" versions, but not the leveraged labor we want yet * You won't need a ton of compute to run AGI (see optimization above), however, you will always be able to throw more compute at problems to get better answers. So yes, compute will still matter. * The 6-12 months after AGI is here, we will have a new wave of physics discoveries. We don't need new experiments or hardware to pick the low hanging fruit of the new physics right in front of us. We already have enough evidence that needs to be parsed. 2nd wave will happen after new hardware is created (with the help of AGI ofc) * The only two moats will be energy/compute and information/data
더 보기
My stubborn and completely uninformed opinions on AGI: - when AGI finally arrives it will be blindingly obvious and there will be no debate whether it’s here - this is in fact a good proxy test: so long as reasonable people earnestly disagree, it is not here. This test is circular, unsatisfactory, yet useful - we will have a precise definition of what AGI is when the proxy test is passed. The reference implementation will inform the definition - we have not passed the Turing test. People were tricked for a while the way they were with Eliza, but that decays fast. Not only can you tell you’re chatting with a model, you can often tell which model it is (of course the level of sophistication is incomparable) - this says nothing about the timelines. Labs may have AGI tech internally already, or it may take another few years of doubling, or we may be far away, I don't know - none of this diminishes the risk or utility of what's coming
더 보기