๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

AJ
@ItsmeAjayKV
Bullish on local AI OSS FTW Independent AI R&D. quants, repe, kernel. 1x 3060, 1x 3090: 64GB RAM N4 (ๆ—ฅๆœฌ่ชžๅ‹‰ๅผทไธญ) ๐ŸŽŒ
๊ฐ€์ž… September 2016
862 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    9.1K ํŒฌ
@deepseek_ai Deepseek-v4.1-flash-v2 coming ๐Ÿ‘€!! I'm more convinced something has changed behind the deepseek-platform api. The "deepseek-flash" endpoint seems to be routing to a different model now. It could be: - Deepseek-v4.2-flash - An updated checkpoint of v4.1-flash Since it's also a little slower, i wonder if V4.1-pro is being quietly tested behind the endpoint. But either way, i'm getting way better result, the difference is noticeable. See the comparison video, same prompt, same settings.
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ