๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Kaff ๐Ÿ“Š
@Kaffchad
Yield Guy | farming strats & real yield alpha. Risk on! My posts are NFA Telegram: @kafka0202 Channel:
๊ฐ€์ž… October 2021
1.8K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    22.7K ํŒฌ
ppl still tend to think of @pendle_fi as a place to farm yield and speculate on points. But Pendle is slowly moving away from the exact kind of incentive-heavy model that made it popular in the first place. โ€“ Q3 emissions down ~58%, with reported YTD cuts reaching ~93% โ€“ Annualized $PENDLE inflation ~0.2% โ€“ V2 TVL grew 43% in Q3 to ~$1.16B โ€“ Buybacks covered emissions 3.2x in Q3, up from 1.6x in Q2 โ€“ ~$1.36M used for buybacks during Q3 Cutting incentives that aggressively while TVL still grew is pretty wild, considering how much DeFi liquidity tends to disappear the moment rewards dry up. Instead of rewarding whoever parks the biggest bag, pools now earn roughly $0.25 in PENDLE for every $1 in weekly trading fees, capped at $625/week. Mature pools get just ~0.2% APR on up to $2.5M TVL, while another incentive stream rewards actual order-book depth, with issuer co-incentives getting a 15โ€“22% match from Pendle. Basically, less free lunch for idle TVL. More rewards for pools that actually get used. This is where sPENDLE starts making sense. Rather than locking $PENDLE for up to two years under the old vePENDLE model, holders can now stake with a 14-day withdrawal cooldown, or pay 5% to exit instantly. Around 80% of retained protocol fees fund $PENDLE buybacks, which are distributed to active stakers every two weeks. โ†’ Better liquidity brings more trading, more trading generates fees, fees fund buybacks, and sPENDLE holders capture some of that activity instead of relying on fresh emissions. Meanwhile, Pendle's liquidity mix is quietly changing too. โ€“ RWA-backed dollars reached ~85% of its top 50 markets by end-Q3, up from ~70% mid-year โ€“ @ethenaโ€™s share went from ~77% in Aug 2025 to below 10% โ€“ @re, @withAUSD, Sky and other yield-bearing assets are taking a bigger slice Though there's still a catch. โ€“ Total fees fell ~18% in one Q3 comparison window โ€“ Trading fees dropped ~40% over that period โ€“ sPENDLE's estimated yield was only ~1.25% annualized in some periods So that 3.2x buyback/emission ratio isn't entirely because business is booming. A lot of it comes from cutting the emissions denominator. Plus, ~90% of capital faces maturities in Q4. Whether that money rolls over without heavy incentives is probably the biggest test ahead. Still, I like the direction here. Pendle already showed it can slash emissions without immediately nuking TVL. Now the question is whether fees and trading demand can grow enough to make the whole thing sustainable. Less paying people to park money, more earning from people actually using the product. That's a much more interesting version of DeFi imo.
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ