가입 후 초대 링크를 공유하면 동영상 재생 및 초대 보상을 받을 수 있습니다.

Möbius
@MobiusExchange
Unified Margin for All DeFi Backed by @yzilabs
가입 January 2025
44 팔로잉 중    1.4K
Why choose the PerpDEX with the lowest fees when you can trade across Lighter, Hyperliquid, and every other Perp DEX from a single account? simply because trading fees are only a small part of the cost. the bigger hidden costs are slippage, liquidity, uptime/reliability, collateral usage, and execution quality. the way to solve these hidden costs is to allocate positions intelligently across multiple venues while using a single account to achieve the lowest all-in execution cost. instead of forcing traders to choose one venue, Mobius gives traders one Credit Account with shared collateral and unified buying power, allowing execution to happen on Hyperliquid, Lighter, Aster, or any supported Perp DEX. execution can happen wherever conditions are best. now you only need one credit account → becomes your single source of buying power, with unified collateral, traders can borrow against it, increase leverage, and deploy capital without constantly moving funds between venues. as perpDEXs compete for order flow, traders shouldn’t have to choose where to park capital. they should just choose what to trade and the credit layer handles the rest.
더 보기
I'm very long $LIT and all, but these comparisons against @HyperliquidX fees are always very cherry picked imo They're completely ignoring staking tier discounts, maker discounts, volume discounts. Even just 100-1000 staked $HYPE, >$10m monthly volume, and executing ~50/50 maker/taker quickly gets you down to less than half of the displayed 4.5bp fees. For reference, my lifetime fees paid (very little HIP3 RWA volume) is just under 1bp. $BTC is always used as an example because of how bad slippage would exceed the fee discount on most altcoins. Funnily enough, if you change it to $LIT itself, @Hyperliquid becomes much cheaper than @Lighter_xyz to trade with slippage accounted for. If you literally only swing trade $BTC every single day, Lighter is probably cheaper, and potentially by a decent chunk if you only slam takers and stake no $HYPE (though I'd say both of those are a bit of a skill issue). If you trade a broader universe of alts, taker in/maker out, stake any $HYPE etc, it's way more favorable for Hyperliquid. Even if Hyperliquid was 1-2bps more expensive on majors, how much are you saving in capital efficiency by not needing to have collateral anywhere else for the pairs that are less liquid on Lighter? How much do you value access to much deeper liquidity on RWAs? How much do you value better uptime/reliability? Lighter has become way better over time but I've lost more money on Lighter to downtime (around 10/10 for example) and cancelled TWAPs than I've paid in lifetime fees on Hyperliquid. TLDR: Lighter is cheaper for a certain style and size of trader, Hyperliquid is cheaper for others. Real world use is way closer than these calculators portray. I use, own, and like both.
더 보기