๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ
@OopsGuess
Resisting oblivion by recording how ppl remain human in a world collapsing into noise. Clarity is rebellion. Memory is the weapon. I'm allergic to stupidity.
๊ฐ€์ž… September 2022
250 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    58K ํŒฌ
What exactly is Japan afraid of? If the Enemy State Clauses are truly irrelevant to a peaceful Japan, then they are just words sitting quietly in the UN Charter. They become politically uncomfortable only when Tokyo wants to escape the historical status and restraints created by the war it lost. Fascist Japan was not admitted into the postwar order as a victor. It entered as a defeated state that accepted that order. So why the urgency to erase the reminder? A restraint is frightening only when you are thinking about crossing the line it was written to restrain. The clause is not the threat. The behavior that could make it relevant is.
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
้ซ˜ๅธ‚้ฆ–็›ธใ€ใ€Œๆ—งๆ•ตๅ›ฝๆก้ …ใ€ใฎๅ‰Š้™คใ‚’ๅ›ฝ้€ฃๆผ”่ชฌใงไธปๅผตใธ๏ผไธญๅ›ฝใซๅ่ซ–