๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Patient Investor โœˆ๏ธ HOOD Summit โ€˜26
@PSInvestor
Real Estate Developer | Investor '16 | NFA Perma Bull 13x $MU 10x $APLD 8X $CIFR 5x $NVTS & more | Next $KOPN $RDW $OSS $AMPG $QS $LIDR $ACHR๐Ÿง˜โ€โ™‚๏ธ
๊ฐ€์ž… June 2025
184 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    6K ํŒฌ
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ I donโ€™t trust the SemiAnalysis piece on $IREN. They label Prince George the โ€œ#1# worst site in the industryโ€ using unnamed users and โ€œweโ€™ve heard the stories.โ€ Thatโ€™s a much lower evidence bar than the methodology they apply when they give Platinum ratings to names like $NBIS. IREN already has $4B+ ARR contracted with Microsoft, NVIDIA and several frontier labs, plus a multi-GW power pipeline. Operational issues at one older Canadian site matter, but they donโ€™t cancel the contracts or the rest of the build. Until they name sources or show the same testing standard they use for the companies they rank highest, this reads more like paid actor than independent research.
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
They say they tested some $IREN capacity themselves โ€” fine. โ€œWeโ€™ve heard the storiesโ€ + unnamed users for the worst-site claim is not enough. Without disclosure this is just paid actor. I am not buying this fake news.
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ