๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Richard Albert
@RichardAlbert
๐Ÿ“ Professor of World Constitutions @UTAustin ๐Ÿ“œ Advisor to Governments and Parliaments ๐ŸŒ Former President of @ICON__S ๐ŸŽ“ Alum @Yale @Harvard @UniofOxford
๊ฐ€์ž… April 2009
155 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    25.9K ํŒฌ
๐Ÿ“ Editing my paper "Is an Unamendable Constitution Undemocratic?," coming soon in the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, with thanks to its outstanding editorial leadership. ๐Ÿ“œ In the paper, I make the case that unamendability is not a technology worth encoding in any constitution. I draw from the results of a first-of-its-kind global survey of constitutional experts to show that there are costs to legality and legitimacy when incumbents exploit the mechanisms of law to overcome an unamendable constitution. ๐Ÿ”‘ My principal purpose is to steer constitution-makers away from designing constitutions that induce incumbents to follow the path of illegality when they feel handcuffed to an unamendable constitution. I offer detailed recommendations for designing constitutions to be always amendable while simultaneously: (1) protecting the core of the constitution and its highest values; (2) achieving the expressive benefits of unamendability; and (3) respecting the rule of law. ๐Ÿ“ฐ Read an earlier draft here:
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ