๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Russell Sean
@RussellQuantum
@QuanMed_AI- medical robotics research system by AI and Quantum not big Pharma on @Quan_Chain the only auto-migrating quantum chain. MSc Neuro/AI-Robotics Dev
๊ฐ€์ž… September 2022
4.3K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    7.9K ํŒฌ
Nineteen humanoid robots waltzed with human partners in Shanghai this week. The interesting problem isn't the dancing. It's the partner. ๐Ÿค– Choreography alone is solvable, a robot executing a fixed sequence on a flat stage is a well-understood control problem. But adding a human changes the category. A partner applies unpredictable forces through the arms and torso, arrives fractionally early or late & shifts weight in ways no script anticipates. To the robot, that's a continuous stream of disturbances it has to reject while staying upright, in sync with music & in position on a crowded stage. Balance under unmodelled contact is the same problem that stops humanoids working in warehouses and homes. Objects shift, floors slip, people bump into things. A stage with a human partner is a rare public test of exactly that. The hardware: Unitree H2, 180 cm, roughly 70 kg, 31 degrees of freedom, leg joints rated to 360 newton-metres, onboard compute scaling to 2,070 TOPS on Nvidia's Jetson AGX Thor. The eyes are cameras. Unitree says the routines ran autonomously in real time. That means no teleoperation & no remote correction, not improvisation. The choreography was learned in advance; what's live is the balance & synchronization. Nineteen machines holding that simultaneously, in front of an audience, with no single failure visible, is the real measurement worth noting here. ๐Ÿ“
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ