For accuracy. Trump does not “give Israel bombs” The US government runs deficits and takes on debt Part of that money is appropriated as so called “military aid” to Israel Israel then spends much of that aid with US MIC companies The money leaves the US Treasury passes through Israel and returns to Lockheed Martin Boeing RTX and other contractors as revenue FIC finances the government debt provides capital to the MIC and capitalises those military revenues into higher corporate valuations That is not charity It is a circular public subsidy for private MIC profits The model is also beginning to change The current aid agreement expires in 2028 and the official negotiations propose gradually moving from aid towards joint investment co-production and a more reciprocal commercial relationship That would turn Israel from a subsidised customer into a paying customer Unless Israel funds those purchases through higher taxes spending cuts or defence exports more of the cost moves onto the Israeli national balance sheet and potentially into Israeli debt At the same time IAI is being prepared for an IPO while Rafael and Tomer are pushing in the same direction Those listings are not complete and Rafael and Tomer do not yet have government approval But the direction is clear US subsidy becomes Israeli expenditure Israeli expenditure becomes US MIC revenue Israeli military assets become securities governed by capital market disclosure investor returns and FIC discipline This is the privatisation of Israel The state assumes more of the cost while private capital gains greater access to the assets revenues and infrastructure created by the Israeli security state The bombs do not disprove negotiations If the regional architecture is changing MIC has every incentive to lock in as much revenue as possible before the subsidy model changes FIC finances it Israel assumes more of the liability MIC captures the revenue Israeli state assets move towards the market And please do not confuse follow the money analysis with advocacy Israel continues to commit crimes against humanity while giving weapons manufacturers plausible deniability for how their products are used Explaining the financial structure does not excuse the crimes It identifies who finances them who profits from them and who is left holding the liabilities Keep following the money And yes, it’s blood money.