Patryk(@Solofunk):The 80% or 90% team allocation with no vesting idea would make for an interesting experiment. I don't recall it ever being done before. I like it in concept (align protocol success with the token entirely, give the core team huge skin in the game with an allocation of that size, they distribute the aligned token to other belivers/investors to fund operations long-term). That said, it's an idea primed for bad actors. This would only work if folks REALLY trusted the founder/team and they had a VALUABLE reputation that would be burned if they played any games. I also think it's a very tough hill to climb for the market to mentally accept that this much supply is given to the core team, simply because it requires so much trust, and that trust to be continually respected by the founder/team, to actually work.

2026.08.05 17:40

The 80% or 90% team allocation with no vesting idea would make for an interesting experiment. I don't recall it ever being done before. I like it in concept (align protocol success with the token entirely, give the core team huge skin in the game with an allocation of that size, they distribute the aligned token to other belivers/investors to fund operations long-term). That said, it's an idea primed for bad actors. This would only work if folks REALLY trusted the founder/team and they had a VALUABLE reputation that would be burned if they played any games. I also think it's a very tough hill to climb for the market to mentally accept that this much supply is given to the core team, simply because it requires so much trust, and that trust to be continually respected by the founder/team, to actually work.

Tulip King 🌷@tulipking

2026.08.04 17:38

Breaking down why crypto projects are no too early to commit to buybacks, and why in fact they have to do buybacks, plus thoughts about how modern tokens should approach issuance 1. The first mistake of the FWA team was to not give themselves any token at the onset. Adam was right he deserves to be paid for his good work, but by not giving himself a meaningful initial allocation, he misaligned his interests with the interests of token holders 1a. If teams commit to their tokens, they themselves should want to be larger holders and better aligned stewards of the projects 2. The "use to earn" token model is innovative and promising, it's worth while to combine this issuance scheme with pump fun style bonding curves to solve for both initial liquidity and users/holders 3. Crypto projects do not have the same economics as Web2 projects, most successful projects have favorable economics that support high buybacks from day 1 4. All tokens should be 100% liquid and vested immediately, let the market set price, no more toxic multi-year vesting structures

커뮤니티로 전달