Crypto card volume hitting $759M/mo looks great on this chart (and I appreciate this)
But did you know?
For protocols, this is mostly a high failure, low-margin distribution channel cuz it is not a reliable revenue business.
โซ Interchange is too thin in key markets
โซ Cashback turns the product into a subsidized loss leader
โซ Survival depends on fragile 3rd party bank + network relationships that have already terminated dozens of programs
And token linked versions are especially brittle cuz the card can keep working while the token goes to 0. The durable +ve revenue only exists in 3 narrow cases๐
1. Scaled custodial platforms extracting real spreads and float
2. Pure infra sitting above the consumer brands
3. Cards run as a secondary feature inside an already profitable exchange or wallet
A typical standalone protocol launch should expect break even/losses, elevated shutdown risk in 12โ24 months and almost no lasting value accrual to the token. Remember the market is consolidating hard around a handful of winners for now while everyone else is just subsidizing them.
If youโre a protocol considering a card business, treat it strictly as a growth and utility tool. Try to control the burn rate and single points of failure or it will not print reliable revenue.
Stablecoins are increasingly being spent by card swipe.
Crypto payment cards have gone from a novelty to more than $750 million in monthly spend. These cards let people pay with crypto anywhere traditional card networks are accepted. Behind the scenes, the crypto โ stablecoins, overwhelmingly โ gets converted to local currency at the point of sale, so the payments look like any other card transactions to merchants.
Crypto cardholders donโt require a traditional bank account. Depending on the program, users either deposit stablecoins with a card issuer, or hold them directly onchain through self-custody. Crypto cards expand peopleโs access to U.S. dollar accounts globally, and they offer a convenient way for stablecoin holders to transact.