๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

liquid ๐Ÿ’ง
@_proxystudio
co-founder, @clanker_world c. 2024 | @liquid_launcher c. 2026 $liq (tokens) + $autono (inference)
๊ฐ€์ž… January 2024
1.6K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    21.9K ํŒฌ
Paper gains that don't even belong to the top 10% of holders who bought immediately after launch. Fuck, they don't even really belong to the first of that top 10 list to sell! The best real defense of the totally normalized illiquidity on new amm pairs is that it would probably be an awful waste of resources to provide these proficient rotatooors with more capital to sell into. Funny to think there are sectors where founders build products and ship them, and then focus on those products instead of focusing on providing 10-15 traders with instant, outsized returns in thanks for them taking on minimal risk
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
I would say itโ€™s mildly disingenuous to parade uPnL as PnL especially when itโ€™s 7 figures and there is 400k of liq