가입 후 초대 링크를 공유하면 동영상 재생 및 초대 보상을 받을 수 있습니다.

Akshat Agrawal
@akshatag77
loading… | prev: @cognition @google @penn
가입 February 2013
1.2K 팔로잉 중    3.1K 팬
Something I’ve updated on with Grok Bot: I think having a team of agents for work is the future. Initially, I yearned for a single super agent and resisted Bot’s multi-agent approach. It’s hard to figure out the “right” setup: the composition of the team, the scope of each agent, etc. But there’s something better about multi-agent I can’t quite articulate yet. One factor is that multi-agent lends itself better to an eventual multiplayer experience with agents. Two is more vague in my mind but the word I keep coming back to is “expressiveness”. Work is increasingly shifting towards building systems vs doing the work by hand, and multi-agent is a much richer medium for expressing the design of that system vs a single agent. Even in the limit if a single agent had infinite context and perfect attention, I feel a multi-agent system would be easier to reason about and debug and thus a better interface long term. Will be writing a longer form post on this with examples once I have more clarity.
더 보기
Grok @bot first impressions: - Best computer use agent I've tried. Ordered groceries, looked through clunky furniture sites, and navigated airline pages quite well. - Clean UX. No model selectors, thinking levels, or context to manage. Takes some "letting go" if you're used to CC/Codex, but I think this form factor will appeal to the masses. Feels like iMessages. - What is the scope of an agent? Should I create an agent for each new task or should I just have a super agent? The UX nudges me towards the former, but I think I prefer having fewer agents. - Agents messaging each other feels like a killer primitive. Excited for when we can share bots with other people. - When am I going to be able to talk to Bots from my Tesla
더 보기