๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Andrew Carr ๐Ÿคธ
@andrew_n_carr
co-founder leading science @getcartwheel co-founder advisor @arcade_ai Past: Codex @OpenAI, Brain @GoogleAI, world ranked Tetris player
๊ฐ€์ž… July 2015
5.3K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    29.4K ํŒฌ
Alphabet is going alphabetical. They had an unreleased Barium model I believe too
btw Google I don't think the arbitrary element naming makes sense in making it clear which model(s) are better, like at least increase in reactivity, electronegativity, go down a group, or smth... Argon is inert, and Carbon is entirely unrelated? I don't get the naming
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ