๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๐Ÿฅ”๐Ÿฅ”๐Ÿฅ”
@argofowl
ai + design + development + potatoes, prev: @csm_news, @ual
๊ฐ€์ž… August 2011
1.5K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    7.9K ํŒฌ
1. opus 5.5 did better 2. this is not gpt sol 6.2
There is NO WAY GPT-6.2 Sol just beat Opus 5.5. After some back-and-forth on, I was finally able to get my hands on the routed GPT-6.2 Sol through a friend. I tested it against Opus 5.5 using the exact same prompt, both at their highest reasoning settings, and the results genuinely surprised me. Here's how they compared: - GPT-6.2 Sol: Took around 20 minutes and cost $9. - Opus 5.5: Took 1 hour and cost $20. Sol nailed the details really well and produced something you'd expect to see in a low-budget animated movie. Opus 5.5 focused more on the overall environment, and it looked really good too. But I have to be honest, Sol did better here. Which one do you think won this comparison?
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ