๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

cv usk
@cv_usk
AI / Software Research Notes AI Agent, LLMOps, MLOps, Software Architecture ๆŠ•็จฟใฏๅ€‹ไบบใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ใงใ™ใ€‚
๊ฐ€์ž… May 2026
270 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    316 ํŒฌ
TL;DR: "The model you use is not the model that was pretrained." An 87-slide lecture that maps post-training โ€” turning a base model into a useful policy โ€” across six stages: imitate, compare, explore, verify, transfer, anticipate. Title: Post-Training LLMs (Kawin Ethayarajh, AI and Economics Summer Institute 2026) URL: Key points ๐Ÿ“ SFT: teach by demonstration. Can imitate whole trajectories (plan, tools), but it's fundamentally imitative โš–๏ธ Offline preference optimization: learn from win/loss. DPO drops the reward model; KTO learns per-outcome, no SFT needed ๐ŸŽฒ Online RL: the current policy explores. REINFORCE/PPO/GRPO; rewards are mostly sequence-level โœ… RLVR: replace the reward model with a checker. Binary pass/fail is enough; scales more predictably than RLHF ๐Ÿงช Environments: an RL env is task + data + interface + tests. The bottleneck shifts from examples to environments ๐Ÿ” On-policy distillation: the teacher scores the student's own rollout. Copies an RL policy in 7โ€“10x fewer steps ๐ŸŒ World adaptation: environments adapt back to agents. "Mecha-nudges" raise machine-readability A systematic map, threaded with an economist's lens. #LLM# #PostTraining#
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ