๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

cv usk
@cv_usk
AI / Software Research Notes AI Agent, LLMOps, MLOps, Software Architecture ๆŠ•็จฟใฏๅ€‹ไบบใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ใงใ™ใ€‚
๊ฐ€์ž… May 2026
270 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    316 ํŒฌ
TL;DR Wrapping coding agent harnesses in a repeated plan-develop-QA loop boosts multi-day autonomous software development performance by an average of 52%. Title: Harness-of-Harness: Multi-Day Autonomous Software Development with Continual Improvement URL: Points ๐Ÿ” It leaves existing harnesses like Codex CLI and OpenCode untouched, adding an iterative improvement layer on top ๐Ÿงญ Splits work into Planner, Developer, and QA Tester roles, carrying verified evidence forward into each new loop ๐Ÿ“Š Improved across all 3 benchmarks and 3 model configs, e.g. GameCraft-Bench score jumping from 49.58 to 71.52 ๐Ÿ’ฐ Beats plain repeated Vanilla passes even at the same pass count, and is more token-efficient too ๐ŸŽฎ A 70-iteration, multi-day case study built a fully playable FPS game from scratch ๐Ÿงฉ Ablations confirm every piece matters: dropping plan updates, evidence feedback, or warm-start each hurts performance What stands out to me is the philosophy: not just running longer, but iterating smartly by accumulating verified knowledge. #AIAgents# #SoftwareEngineering#
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ