๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

cv usk
@cv_usk
AI / Software Research Notes AI Agent, LLMOps, MLOps, Software Architecture ๆŠ•็จฟใฏๅ€‹ไบบใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ใงใ™ใ€‚
๊ฐ€์ž… May 2026
280 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    415 ํŒฌ
โš™๏ธ TL;DR: without touching the model, automatically improving the software that runs the agent cuts token cost by roughly half. Title: SoL-Pi: Recursively Scaling Auto-Research Loops for Efficient Agent Harness URL: ๐Ÿ“Œ Highlights ๐Ÿ” Searched ~150 directions across ~500 environments, running 3,000+ trials to discover efficiency mechanisms ๐Ÿงฉ 4 mechanisms found, including Action Fusion, which merges a file edit and its test run into one request ๐Ÿ“‰ On EdgeBench: 49.0% less token traffic, 33.2% lower cost, at 93.7% of baseline performance ๐Ÿ”„ Applied to Opus 5 with zero extra tuning, still keeps 44.7% token and 33.5% cost reduction ๐Ÿ’ฐ On Terminal-Bench 4, cost per solved task drops 11.6% โฑ Estimated $8.75-13.50/hour savings versus native Codex The interesting part: optimizing the harness instead of the model turns out to be a genuinely production-relevant efficiency lever. #AIAgents# #LLMCostOptimization#
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ