๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

cv usk
@cv_usk
AI / Software Research Notes AI Agent, LLMOps, MLOps, Software Architecture ๆŠ•็จฟใฏๅ€‹ไบบใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ใงใ™ใ€‚
๊ฐ€์ž… May 2026
282 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    431 ํŒฌ
TL;DR A new framework safely repairs the "hallucinations" that happen when LLMs translate natural-language optimization problems into math models and solver code. It lifts accuracy by up to 20 points while keeping regressions below 1%. Title: Fix What's Wrong, Keep What's Right: Hallucination Repair for LLM-Based Optimization Modeling URL: Points ๐Ÿ” Cross-checks the problem text, math model, code, and data in five directions to pinpoint exactly where and why something is wrong โœ‚๏ธ Picks the smallest necessary fix scope, from code-only to a partial model edit to a full structural rebuild, based on evidence ๐Ÿ“œ 24 reusable "RepairCards" spell out, as contracts, what can be changed, what must be protected, and what counts as acceptance โœ… A fix is only kept if it passes both an execution test and an audit; otherwise the original artifact is preserved ๐Ÿ“Š Tested across 6 benchmarks and multiple upstream generators, it improves accuracy by 6.3 to 20.1 points while capping regression at 1.0% ๐Ÿงฉ Removing the diagnosis step alone drops the rescue rate by 24.5 points, confirming each mechanism's contribution Turning "repair" into a systematic post-processing step, rather than just better generation, feels genuinely practical and could extend well beyond optimization into other structured-output generation tasks. #LLM# #OptimizationModeling#
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ