๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

cv usk
@cv_usk
AI / Software Research Notes AI Agent, LLMOps, MLOps, Software Architecture ๆŠ•็จฟใฏๅ€‹ไบบใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ใงใ™ใ€‚
๊ฐ€์ž… May 2026
286 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    468 ํŒฌ
TL;DR Teaching Qwen3 models (1.7B-8B) tool selection over 10,000+ tools with RL beats prompting the 402B Llama-4-Maverick on the same job. Title: Training Small Language Models for Transferable Tool Selection URL: Key points ใƒป๐Ÿงฉ Plan-Retrieve-Select: split the instruction into substeps, retrieve candidates, pick one tool per substep ใƒป๐Ÿงน Noisy ToolBench G3 gold labels are filtered with a teacher model down to 20,093 examples ใƒป๐ŸŽฏ SFT then GRPO: rank-weighted F1 for Plan, exact match for Select ใƒป๐Ÿ“ˆ ToolBench G3 success: 41.5% at 8B vs. 30.6% for the best prompted Maverick ใƒป๐Ÿ” Swap BM25 for the dense retriever COLT and accuracy improves with no retraining ใƒป๐Ÿงช A learned selector adds about 13 points over a BM25 top-1 rule ใƒปโš ๏ธ Planning transfers poorly to TaskBench, where a large prompted model still wins A good example of why a small, purpose-trained model can beat a giant prompted one on cost, speed and accuracy. #LLMAgents# #ToolUse#
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ