Thank you, Malcolm. This is a serious report, and I’d like to respond to its central arguments. I agree that Neo’s strength lies in the combination of its native oracle, NeoFS, deterministic finality, and the NEO/GAS model. “Verifiable data supply” is a compelling thesis—but it must still be tested against real customer demand, repeatable use cases, and sustainable GAS consumption. The governance questions are valid, but evidence and conclusions should remain proportional. Assets under custody are not necessarily freely deployable capital; voting weight is not the same as exercised control; and one unsigned multisig proposal does not establish a system-wide pattern. I also don’t believe product validation must wait until every governance issue is resolved. Product development and institutional improvement should inform each other. I may not agree with every interpretation, but the report gives the ecosystem a concrete thesis to examine and test. That is far more valuable than another abstract debate about narratives.