๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๐Ÿค–DR ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
@davidrhodus
Electrician -- tokens per watt optimizer The model is the commodity. The infra around it is the moat
๊ฐ€์ž… February 2013
596 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    6K ํŒฌ
We spent 16 hours testing an app on Solana from an unstaked sender. The results surprised us. The good: median tx inclusion was under 400ms, with no stake, Jito, priority fees, or stake-weighted QoS. p99 was ~2.8s. 597 of 647 validators accepted 90%+ of what we sent. The bad: ~6.5% of transactions simply disappeared. And geography mattered a lot: same-slot inclusion was 78% when co-located vs. 56% from home. The takeaway: Solana really is fast and deterministic. But for unstaked users, stake and geography still define the edge.
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ