๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ใ€Œ ๐•ฒ๐–”๐–”๐–“ใ€
@goon_crypto
- covering agents | on-chain intelligence | stonkbrokers eco - advisor: @useOttoAI and @ArAistotle clock in
๊ฐ€์ž… March 2020
1.3K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    8.8K ํŒฌ
this isn't just a fact checker, it's a trust layer for an industry that runs on vibes every podcast take gets treated as gospel the second someone says it with a straight face. color-coding it true/false/unverifiable after the fact is the accountability layer CT never built for itself we're one viral clip away from an entire narrative built on something that never checked out
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
Most people in crypto watch a podcast, hear a confident take, and walk away with a new opinion. That's a bug, not a feature. I've been running @ArAIstotle's live fact checker while I watch. Scroll back after and the whole thing's colour-coded: true, false, unverifiable. (It's usually more mixed than the delivery suggests.) Ran it on the boss @ethermage's appearance on the @CoinDesk podcast last week... Turns out most of what he said checks out. Verified. That's not a given in this space (ask me how I know). The tool doesn't care how smooth someone sounds. It just runs the claims. Which podcaster would you want to run through it first? Get on @ArAIstotle now. You won't watch a crypto pod the same way again.
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ