๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Kasper
@kaskulikowski
@Google Building the Agentic Web. Opinions are my own.
๊ฐ€์ž… December 2015
227 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    247 ํŒฌ
Iโ€™ve been experimenting with Jev and WebMCP ๐Ÿ˜ - Jev selects the next tool and fills enumerable inputs. If the same call needs free text or a number, it falls back to LLM. If that same call also needs free text, a number, or another non-enumerable value, an LLM fills only those remaining fields. What's also interesting is that based on the confidence score given by Jev we can make decisions in harness - if Jev is 97% sure we might trigger the tool - but if the confidence is, let's say, 60% we might want to do additional checks! Evals next? ๐Ÿค” 1/2 ๐Ÿงต
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ