๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

LlamaIndex ๐Ÿฆ™
@llama_index
The most accurate agentic OCR platform for production AI. LlamaParse: Docs:
๊ฐ€์ž… December 2022
38 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    120.7K ํŒฌ
confidence scores only matter if they help you decide what to automate. for document extraction, that usually means knowing how much work you can safely accept at a given precision target. in our latest post, we look at confidence scoring through that lens, including: โœ…๏ธ confidence cutoffs โœ…๏ธ precision vs. recall โœ…๏ธ score coverage โœ…๏ธ score granularity โœ…๏ธ human review volume using ExtractBench, we compare how different extraction systems perform after confidence filtering. at a 97% precision target, LlamaParse Agentic Plus reached 66.48% recall on expected fields after filtering. the useful part of a confidence score isnโ€™t the number itself. itโ€™s whether you can use it to control automation and review in production. ๐Ÿ‘‰๏ธ read the full post:
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ