๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Mike P
@mikepat711
Shitposting, PhD. Meme Researcher.
๊ฐ€์ž… February 2012
3.5K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    19.8K ํŒฌ
Grok build for multi-agent research workflows. What I did: Asked Grok to deeply research industrial projects across the state of Florida. I asked Grok to deploy sub-agents to run deep dive research in each region of Florida with strong industrial activity. I pointed Grok to a folder on my PC that houses hundreds of PDFs connected to the products I sell, and asked it to focus on companies that utilize these products in their manufacturing process. I asked for a research report deliverable, with separate call sheet document. The output: Grok supervisor agent deployed 5 sub-agents in different parts of FL: Space coast, Central FL, Tampa area, and South FL. Each sub-agent delivered a report for its region, going over market signals, investment $, and individual facilities that are expanding/receiving new investment. Each agent delivered 10-15 companies to dive into, with complimentary call sheet for next steps. Iโ€™ve been running these reports using Claude dynamic workflows and not even gonna lie, Grok is delivering equally useful bangers. This wouldโ€™ve been far from true not long ago. Grok Build is about to come off the bench and enter the token rotation ๐Ÿฅน
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ