๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Morgan
@morganlinton
cofounder @boldmetrics / studying how llms think @vulcanbench / early @sonos views are my own
๊ฐ€์ž… January 2009
1.2K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    47.9K ํŒฌ
I keep hearing more good things about Antigravity. To be honest, I had totally counted it out. Now, Google seems to be making major steps forward with their models, and now their harness. Only way to know, for me, is to benchmark with @VulcanBench and compare ๐Ÿ–– I know Google is making some changes/updates to Antigravity this week, so I'll wait for those to hit, and then start comparing harnesses. My plan to start is to compare Pi and Antigravity. Pi is such a solid harness, I feel like it's the best reference. Now to just figure out how to get access to Google's models without going broke ๐Ÿ˜… But before I do anything, curious if ppl agree that Pi is a good reference harness if I wanted to compare Antigravity to one harness?
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ