๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Nebius Token Factory
@nebiustf
Own your intelligence. Precision-built inference for AI workloads at scale. Powered by @nebiusai | Discord:
๊ฐ€์ž… November 2024
590 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    11.8K ํŒฌ
thanks for the shoutout ๐Ÿซก
great shoutout from @chamath on the all in pod today. "you need to go to a vendor that you trust, could be Nebius" perfect recap of why, if your data actually matters, an open source inference path like @nebiustf is the way to go his point, in plain english: you paste a protein design, a deal strategy, a process that is the company into a shared chat api. The vendor says โ€œzero data retention", but that usually means best efforts, not a hard guarantee. then someone hits like / thumbs-up, or the terms allow training on โ€œinsights,โ€ not names, or the next model version justโ€ฆ knows the shape of the answer you thought was private (like in the Navier Stokes case) the scary leak ends up being the solution pattern showing up somewhere you donโ€™t control. so the move isnโ€™t โ€œnever use aiโ€, itโ€™s stop putting crown jewel work on a shared frontier api stand it up on your terms: open weight models, inference on hardware thatโ€™s you can control, a vendor that provisions your stack, the lane Chamath pointed at (aws class, @nebiustf, @FireworksAI_HQ, etc.) Boards are late to this. โ€œWe signed zdrโ€ is starting to look thin next to โ€œdo we actually control where this runs.โ€ Thatโ€™s when the CIO who took the easy api deal becomes the problem
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ