great shoutout from
@chamath on the all in pod today.
"you need to go to a vendor that you trust, could be Nebius"
perfect recap of why, if your data actually matters, an open source inference path like
@nebiustf is the way to go
his point, in plain english:
you paste a protein design, a deal strategy, a process that is the company into a shared chat api. The vendor says โzero data retention", but that usually means best efforts, not a hard guarantee.
then someone hits like / thumbs-up, or the terms allow training on โinsights,โ not names, or the next model version justโฆ knows the shape of the answer you thought was private (like in the Navier Stokes case)
the scary leak ends up being the solution pattern showing up somewhere you donโt control.
so the move isnโt โnever use aiโ, itโs stop putting crown jewel work on a shared frontier api
stand it up on your terms: open weight models, inference on hardware thatโs you can control, a vendor that provisions your stack, the lane Chamath pointed at (aws class,
@nebiustf,
@FireworksAI_HQ, etc.)
Boards are late to this. โWe signed zdrโ is starting to look thin next to โdo we actually control where this runs.โ Thatโs when the CIO who took the easy api deal becomes the problem