๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Pablo ๐Ÿ“
@pablo_veyrat
Co-Founder @merkl_xyz ๐Ÿฅจ, @AngleProtocol ๐Ÿ“ Proud European citizen building an open financial ecosystem ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ
๊ฐ€์ž… April 2012
299 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    4.7K ํŒฌ
On this, that's why @merkl_xyz has a feature that lets you reward lending protocol users based on utilization. e.g 0% utilization -> stablecoin issuer pays its full NIM 100% utilization -> stablecoin issuer pays nothing Incentives should scale with the revenue you generate
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
Great and underrated point by @joakimhi. Once a stablecoin is lent out, it gets redeemed and offramped via DEX swaps or CEXs (about 80%) -- so it's not the issuer paying that yield. In my experience, that's exactly why stablecoin issuers struggle to make long-term structural yield-share economics work doing deals direct with lending protocols natively.
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ