Most NFTs give you something to own. What happens when ownership also gives you something that can act? That's the question that makes @meetmotes interesting to me. Motes is designing an ecosystem of 20,000 Genesis NFTs, each representing an AI financial agent connected to its own smart account on Robinhood Chain. One NFT. One agent. One account. I think this is a meaningful departure from the usual NFT model. Instead of relying entirely on artwork, scarcity, or community identity, Motes is exploring ownership as a gateway to financial automation. The owner defines the strategy, sets permissions, and determines the limits within which the agent is allowed to operate. But here's my perspective. Giving an NFT utility isn't enough. That utility must remain valuable after the excitement around minting disappears. If holders eventually use their agents because they genuinely simplify financial decisions, the NFT becomes more than a collectible. It becomes an interface for a service. That's the real opportunity I see in Motes. The interesting question isn't whether people want to own 20,000 AI characters. It's whether people will want to use the agents behind them. Would you value an NFT more for its rarity or for what it can actually do?