๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Guillermo Rauch
@rauchg
๊ฐ€์ž… July 2008
661 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    887K ํŒฌ
We ran fresh Next.js evals. The tally: โ‘  Opus 5.5 [๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿฝ%] โ‘ก GPT 6 Sol [๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿฝ%] โ‘ข Fable 5.1 [๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿฝ%] โ‘ฃ Grok 4.7 [๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿบ%] Notably, Grok is 2x-7x cheaper
GPT-6 Sol debuts at 97% on Next.js evals, tying the highest success rate. Claude Opus 5.5 also reached 97%, joining Claude Fable 5.1. Opus ranks first among the three on average cost. View the leaderboard โ†“
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ