๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Robert Lauko
@robert_lauko
Founder of Liquity and (AI-based scientific impact ranking of papers)
๊ฐ€์ž… February 2020
342 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    6.5K ํŒฌ
We tested Claude, GPT-5.2, and Gemini as scientific paper reviewers on @KurateOrg. When scoring arXiv papers on impact (1โ€“10), GPT clusters around 7โ€“8 and Gemini is similar. Claude Opus 4.6 uses the full range, making it a far better discriminator. See the distributions ๐Ÿ‘‡
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ