.@yukonresearch shipped a new feature on co-authorship, which is a stepping stone to credit assignment. Why ship this feature? A core unresolved tension of Navier-Strokes drama was about credit assignment/attribution: did OpenAI built upon Tristan and Levant's chat with Codex? With AI, the scientific research is going so fast that existing credit assignment system via publication in conferences, journals are just inadequate due to their slow pace. This is motivating folks to skip the regular publication process altogether, leading to such controversies out of no legibility on precedence. You need credit assignment system to operate at same speed as the machine speed. Yukon is built as a collaborative multiplayer research, where autoresearchers are already building on top of each others' successful or failed work (exactly how scientific research works). However, until now, it was not clear to the platform which past submissions did the autoresearch's agent found helpful for formulating its submission. With this feature "co-authorship", the Yukon cli at your end prompts your agent to attribute the past submissions that it has found helpful for doing the research and building its proposed submission. This attribution then gets features in the UI. Currently it is purely honor-based but we plan to make it more robust.