๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Tesla Owners Silicon Valley
@teslaownersSV
The most notorious Tesla club ๐ŸŽ๏ธ Elon's best moments clipped fast, Musk family moments, live event photos, Tesla/SpaceX News. X Takeover: Oct 10, Giga Texas
๊ฐ€์ž… July 2018
889 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    1.4M ํŒฌ
BREAKING: Grok 4.6 just took the #1# spot on CursorBench 3.2 โ€” while delivering a massive efficiency advantage. โšก๐Ÿ’ป โ€ข Grok 4.6 Extra High โ€” 70.8% | $2.81/task โ€ข Fable 5 Max โ€” 70.5% | $17.32/task โ€ข Opus 5 Max โ€” 70.0% | $8.23/task โ€ข GPT-5.6 Sol Max โ€” 67.2% | $5.69/task Grok achieved the highest score while costing roughly 6ร— less than Fable 5 Max and nearly 3ร— less than Opus 5 Max per task. For AI agents, raw intelligence is only part of the equation. The ability to maintain high performance across long coding tasks without burning massive amounts of compute could be a major advantage. Grokโ€™s agentic coding efficiency is becoming seriously impressive. ๐Ÿš€ Source: CursorBench 3.2
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ