๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

toly ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
@toly
Co-Founder of Solana Labs. Award winning phone creator. NFA, donโ€™t trust me, mostly technical gibberish.
๊ฐ€์ž… February 2014
7.2K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    2.7M ํŒฌ
Post more data about 553/spg-3 the resource fee inclusion simd. My two cents. A perfect scheduler with infinite bandwidth and 0 pipeline latency would work with 0 inclusion fee, and if there is no tax leakage priority fee revenue is the same as fee burn. But nothing is perfect. IMHO, itโ€™s worth experimenting but i dont want to break any existing apps. So itโ€™s probably a good idea to experiment within the same budget as the current signature fee on average, while figuring out how to have the inclusion fee burn target the โ€œgoodโ€ txs and not the bad ones. PRAW :)
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ