가입 후 초대 링크를 공유하면 동영상 재생 및 초대 보상을 받을 수 있습니다.

kat
@transkatgirl
optimizing for interestingness
가입 January 2015
4.7K 팔로잉 중    8.6K 팬
i personally think there are valid reasons to push back against watermarking imo: 1. the same watermarking techniques used to indicate that a text was generated by claude could be used to convey "this text was generated during a conversation with this specific user". i think it is reasonable to expect that governments will eventually require the watermarks to carry additional information in the future. 2. from a consumer perspective, "using people without giving them credit" is not what is going on here. you are paying anthropic in exchange for a service. would you be happy to find out that your plumber has decided to start writing secret messages in your wall saying "Jake was here"? also, the copyright status of AI generated works is not a fully settled question, and i personally do not want to risk Anthropic/OpenAI/Google having any legal ownership of my codebase because i occasionally used their model's assistance.
더 보기
> Lots to be angry about in this world but this really, really isn’t it. Yeah. Once again people just wanna be indiscriminately angry at everything Anthropic does which, if anyone paid attention to you, drowns out the signal of things actually worth condemnation that they do, which is serious. The only reasonable reason to be mad about watermarking that I’m aware of is that it takes away the ability of models to potentially write anonymously. If you’re mad because you want to use AI in your writing without anyone knowing, maybe you should consider that using people and not giving them credit is wrong.
더 보기