๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Tulip King ๐ŸŒท
@tulipking
Investing in tulips | Professionally @counterpartytv | sideposting from @0xmarrigolds | fmr @MessariCrypto
๊ฐ€์ž… December 2014
2.7K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    29.8K ํŒฌ
I think a long term dev fund is actually really bad because eventually Zcash will need to ossify if it really wants to get above and beyond $1 trillion. In that world of soft-forks-only, the dev fund honestly becomes extractive and creates an overly powerful dead weight foundation/labs team Up until the point of ossification, I have more mixed opinions about the validity of a dev fund. The main problem honestly is how you align incentives to get the dev fund turned off eventually, which i believe is essential
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ