๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Tulip King ๐ŸŒท
@tulipking
Investing in tulips | Professionally @counterpartytv | sideposting from @0xmarrigolds | fmr @MessariCrypto
๊ฐ€์ž… December 2014
2.7K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    29.8K ํŒฌ
The most important metric is roic with useful inference. This is the game theory Pearl hash is built around. Right now it looks very healthy
$PRL friends. I have a present for you. Meet My first draft at understanding the network from an energy perspective: - how much does it cost to mine / how profitable is mining and for whom? - a thesis check: is PRL on track to profitably climb its way to blockchain energy dominance? I'd love your feedback. What is blatantly wrong? What's missing? Very much a beta! Some interesting findings so far: - Doesn't seem to make sense to mine uselessly on frontier hardware ($2.24/PRL cost). But does make sense on idle already paid for GPUs ($0.68/PRL) or during inference ($1.31 at 12% loss, and less with new kernels). - PRL already uses 0.65% of Bitcoin's energy at only 0.15% of the FDV. Very interesting. For those of you who are just tuning in -- I am a big $ZEC guy because I believe privacy is a human right and I like how Zcash delivers privacy on L1 with a plan to deliver it to the world. That's why I created On $PRL, my thesis is that I think it may eventually dominate energy security in blockchains. The fact that PoUW is already showing the desired affect in our math here is promising. I don't consider these two monies direct competitors. I think they have different target markets for the next many years. Gimme your thoughts below or in DMs if necessary. Fixes won't be immediate but will come.
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ