Macauley(@yeluacaM):This has always baffled me: CFPB’s whole premise was that consumers deserve disclosure and conduct standards, not paternalistic prohibition. Warren’s crypto opposition inverts that and its practical effect is to protect the incumbents she built the agency to police. There’s an alternative reality where @SenWarren is adamantly pro-crypto, as logically more consistent with the CFPB mission.

2026.08.02 08:37

This has always baffled me: CFPB’s whole premise was that consumers deserve disclosure and conduct standards, not paternalistic prohibition. Warren’s crypto opposition inverts that and its practical effect is to protect the incumbents she built the agency to police. There’s an alternative reality where @SenWarren is adamantly pro-crypto, as logically more consistent with the CFPB mission.

Mike Belshe@mikebelshe

2026.08.01 10:01

Well stated. A vote against CLARITY at this point is a vote against consumer protection. @SenWarren is protects the establishment.

커뮤니티로 전달