๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Yeon ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท
@yeonwoo1102
Believe in yourself. Donโ€™t copy me.
๊ฐ€์ž… October 2021
375 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    15.7K ํŒฌ
Let me address what I believe is the fundamental issue.Based on the information available to me, the current transaction tax is 1.7%, with 50% going to the creator and 50% to the platform. At the most basic level, this already gives creators a substantial amount in fees. I am not happy with that structure either, but I will set that aside for now.The more serious issue is what happens when a developer launches a token and that token becomes popular. The developer continues to earn fees indefinitely, even if they are no longer actively contributing to the project. Furthermore, those fees are paid in the token itself rather than in ETH or USDG. This naturally creates a continuous stream of potential sell pressure, as the developer has to sell those tokens to realize the fee revenue. So my question is simple: Who exactly is this system designed to benefit?The transaction tax is already higher than on competing platforms. On top of that, developers can abandon their tokens, continue collecting fees, and sell those tokens into the market. In the end, the users trading on the platform and the token holders are the ones who bear the full cost of this structure.
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ