๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

(((ู„()(ู„() 'yoav))))๐Ÿ‘พ
@yoavgo
๊ฐ€์ž… May 2009
2.2K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    92K ํŒฌ
an alternative would be: Program Chairs decide on a quality level and accept only above this quality, regardless of %, and we will see what % we will get. And be ok with low ones.
75% of respondents think @iclr_conf should lower the acceptance rate to about 10%. This could not only help with conference logistics and experience, it might also have a lasting effect on the number and quality of submitted work in later years.
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ