📢I often write to you about subsequent letters of request that I receive from military units. Today I give the floor to brave men, I am preparing the next shipment to Kherson for them - will we help? of course! I hope that you will help me!💪 you create @Brigade688 🙏❤️🔥 https://t.co/sbdIVIsgBx

Some other examples of documents you can generate with Grok Studio. 1 - forms to print 2 - tax invoices 3 - official letters 4 - legal documents (don't forget to verify them) And much more Just Grok ask to "output as pdf". https://t.co/iFEdQyivHp

Grok Studio can now generate PDFs. Currently in beta, It can already create letters, resumes, tax invoices, or even a menu for a restaurant. Can we interest you in a Cybertruck Coleslaw? Or perhaps some MAGA Meatballs? https://t.co/tUPu9Y6UUG

It was Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday, and Ghislaine Maxwell was preparing a special gift to mark the occasion. She turned to Epstein’s family and friends. One of them was Donald Trump. Maxwell collected letters from Trump and dozens of Epstein’s other associates for a 2003 birthday album, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. Pages from the leather-bound album—assembled before Epstein was first arrested in 2006—are among the documents examined by Justice Department officials who investigated Epstein and Maxwell years ago, according to people who have reviewed the pages. It’s unclear if any of the pages are part of the Trump administration’s recent review. The president’s past relationship with Epstein is at a sensitive moment. The Justice Department documents, the so-called Epstein files, and who or what is in them are at the center of a storm consuming the Trump administration. On Wednesday, after angry comments about how the files are a hoax created by Democrats, President Trump lashed out at his own supporters for refusing to let the matter go. The letter bearing Trump’s name, which was reviewed by the Journal, is bawdy—like others in the album. It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman’s breasts, and the future president’s signature is a squiggly “Donald” below her waist, mimicking pubic hair. The letter concludes: “Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.” In an interview with the Journal on Tuesday evening, Trump denied writing the letter or drawing the picture. “This is not me. This is a fake thing. It’s a fake Wall Street Journal story,” he said. “I never wrote a picture in my life. I don’t draw pictures of women,” he said. “It’s not my language. It’s not my words.” He told the Journal he was preparing to file a lawsuit if it published an article. “I’m gonna sue The Wall Street Journal just like I sued everyone else,” he said. Read more: https://t.co/eRGY3G9nXj

Ready for your next book? Check out these newly released paperbacks, from Ralph Ellison’s selected letters to Emily Henry’s newest novel, a history of two abolitionist sisters and more. Here are six paperbacks we recommend → Week https://t.co/nR4VsC8gKA

The Sachal Aaykar Seva Kendra is an innovation by Income Tax Mumbai to bring tax services closer to taxpayers. The third Seva Kendra at JNPT, Mumbai, received an excellent response with our team assisting taxpayers, addressing queries, and resolving difficulties. At the Sachal Aaykar Seva Kendra, taxpayers can: - File letters and receive instant e-acknowledgement without visiting Income Tax offices in Mumbai - Access all services available on the Income Tax portal We are committed to assisting you, answering your questions, and resolving any difficulties.

Man shows the letter he received saying his EBT Food Stamps have been cut from $2,800 per month down to $350, and he’s upset “I literally got 5 kids, I'm trying to sit here and spend time with them. I'm not trying to go work 50, 60 hours a week so I can pay bills” “I literally just got this piece of mail today saying that due to new policy changes from the Trump administration” They just don’t want to work This is what I voted for.

He sent a detailed letter directly to an early investor who round tripped it all. No remorse, just a calculated exit. “My only viable way out.” “It would’ve tanked the price.” “I had to disappear permanently.” Crypto just witnessed its first pseudocide exit strategy. (2/4)

A new legal letter aimed at OpenAI lays out in stark terms the money and power grab OpenAI is trying to trick its board members into accepting — what one analyst calls "the theft of the millennium." The simple facts of the case are both devastating and darkly hilarious. I'll explain for your amusement. The letter 'Not For Private Gain' is written for the relevant Attorneys General and is signed by 3 Nobel Prize winners among dozens of top ML researchers, legal experts, economists, ex-OpenAI staff and civil society groups. (I'll link below.) It says that OpenAI's attempt to restructure as a for-profit is simply totally illegal, like you might naively expect. It then asks the Attorneys General (AGs) to take some extreme measures I've never seen discussed before. Here's how they build up to their radical demands. For 9 years OpenAI and its founders went on ad nauseam about how non-profit control was essential to: 1. Prevent a few people concentrating immense power 2. Ensure the benefits of artificial general intelligence (AGI) were shared with all humanity 3. Avoid the incentive to risk other people's lives to get even richer They told us these commitments were legally binding and inescapable. They weren't in it for the money or the power. We could trust them. "The goal isn't to build AGI, it's to make sure AGI benefits humanity" said OpenAI President Greg Brockman. And indeed, OpenAI’s charitable purpose, which its board is legally obligated to pursue, is to “ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity” rather than advancing “the private gain of any person.” 100s of top researchers chose to work for OpenAI at below-market salaries, in part motivated by this idealism. It was core to OpenAI's recruitment and PR strategy. Now along comes 2024. That idealism has paid off. OpenAI is one of the world's hottest companies. The money is rolling in. But now suddenly we're told the setup under which they became one of the fastest-growing startups in history, the setup that was supposedly totally essential and distinguished them from their rivals, and the protections that made it possible for us to trust them, ALL HAVE TO GO ASAP: 1. The non-profit's (and therefore humanity at large’s) right to super-profits, should they make tens of trillions? Gone. (Guess where that money will go now!) 2. The non-profit’s ownership of AGI, and ability to influence how it’s actually used once it’s built? Gone. 3. The non-profit's ability (and legal duty) to object if OpenAI is doing outrageous things that harm humanity? Gone. 4. A commitment to assist another AGI project if necessary to avoid a harmful arms race, or if joining forces would help the US beat China? Gone. 5. Majority board control by people who don't have a huge personal financial stake in OpenAI? Gone. 6. The ability of the courts or Attorneys General to object if they betray their stated charitable purpose of benefitting humanity? Gone, gone, gone! Screenshotting from the letter: (I'll do a new tweet after each image so they appear right.) 1/