SciTech Era(@SciTechera):Wow. That's crazy. 105× cheaper than Fable 5. 👀 DeepSeek V4 Flash outperformed Claude Fable 5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 while costing around 105× less per completed benchmark task. DeepSeek V4 Flash scored 82.7 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, ahead of Claude Fable 5's 80.5. According to Artificial Analysis, the estimated cost per benchmark task is just $0.03 for DeepSeek V4 Flash, compared with $3.15 for Claude Fable 5, making it about 105× cheaper. We're entering an era where frontier-level AI is becoming radically more affordable!

SciTech Era

@SciTechera

i write on AI, longevity, singularity, robotics, energy and the latest SciTech breakthroughs. by(@alxom17)

加入 October 2023

545 正在关注 22.6K 粉丝

SciTech Era@SciTechera

2026.08.02 06:44

Wow. That's crazy. 105× cheaper than Fable 5. 👀 DeepSeek V4 Flash outperformed Claude Fable 5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 while costing around 105× less per completed benchmark task. DeepSeek V4 Flash scored 82.7 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, ahead of Claude Fable 5's 80.5. According to Artificial Analysis, the estimated cost per benchmark task is just $0.03 for DeepSeek V4 Flash, compared with $3.15 for Claude Fable 5, making it about 105× cheaper. We're entering an era where frontier-level AI is becoming radically more affordable!

显示更多