> 99.77% no > turnout is too low > okay turnout is higher now but it's self-selected > okay unique operators also say no but they don't speak for their delegators > okay solo stakers also say no but validators are obviously conflicted > asking validators about issuance is like asking landlords about rent > actually validator opinion was never relevant > users are what matter > no there is no way to measure what users think > measurable preferences are not social consensus > wow 99.9% no > this level of opposition is actually evidence of validator capture > precisely the entrenched rent-seeking constituency EIP-8363 is meant to fix > every additional no vote strengthens the case for ignoring the vote > 100% no > unprecedented proof that reform is urgently needed > proponents unchanged > rough consensus achieved