注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

rf.extended
@rf_extended
Founder @extendedapp, formerly @revolut Views my own. Info only. No advice, offer or solicitation. Not for persons in restricted jurisdictions.
加入 October 2021
874 正在关注    5.2K 粉丝
From our conversations with TradFi brokers, it’s clear that moving to 24/7 is quickly becoming table stakes. To get there, most are looking at two routes: launching perps (either in-house or via partners) or extending CFDs to 24/7 and hedging the exposure externally. When discussing the second approach, hedging CFD exposure with perps (instead of futures, leveraged spot, etc.), two structural differences stand out: 1. Deterministic liquidation vs operational margining. In TradFi, margining is rule-based but involves operational processes and potential grace periods, while in perps liquidation is fully deterministic and continuous, ensuring individual account and system-wide solvency without credit assumptions. 2. Managing funding vs rollover / borrow costs. Perp funding is realized more frequently (hourly / 8-hour), and can be significantly more volatile as it reacts in real time to positioning imbalances, compared to the smoother, benchmark-driven cost of carry in futures and financing markets. None of those are blockers to a wider institutional adoption of perps, but rather observations on how traditional players are already adapting their ways of working to benefit from perps and DeFi.
显示更多
0
29
164
16
转发到社区